⚠ Active Enforcement 2025–2026

Nominee Structures in Thailand
Are Under Serious Scrutiny

Thai authorities have identified thousands of suspected nominee companies and continue active enforcement. If your shareholding arrangement does not reflect genuine Thai ownership, your company may be at risk. Take our free self-assessment to understand your exposure — and find out what your options are.

What Is Happening Right Now

Thailand’s Department of Business Development (DBD) and associated enforcement agencies have been conducting an active and expanding crackdown on nominee shareholding structures since 2024. The enforcement is not limited to large or obvious cases — thousands of smaller companies in tourism, hospitality, and real estate have been flagged for investigation.

Recent Enforcement Actions

  • The DBD has identified over 7,000 suspected nominee companies in tourism and real estate on Koh Samui and Koh Phangan alone, with active investigations underway.
  • Bangkok Post reported a nationwide probe targeting up to 27,000 juristic entities for suspected nominee use.
  • Thai Examiner confirmed continued raids, document inspections, and enforcement actions targeting illegal nominee arrangements in 2025–2026.
  • Pattaya Mail noted that intensified enforcement is pushing investors to move away from nominee structures as regulatory risk increases significantly.

⚠ Land-Holding Structures: The Highest Risk Category

Companies holding land through Thai nominee shareholders face the most serious exposure. Using a Thai national as a nominee to hold land on behalf of a foreign beneficial owner violates the Land Code, the Foreign Business Act, and potentially the Criminal Code. Land-holding nominee structures are the enforcement authorities’ primary target. If your company holds land and the Thai shareholder(s) do not have genuine financial stakes, this requires immediate legal review.

A nominee arrangement does not require intent to deceive — structures that were commonly used in the past and never formally challenged may still constitute violations under current enforcement standards. The question is not whether the arrangement was always done this way, but whether it is compliant today.

Free Nominee Risk Self-Assessment

Two parts. Takes approximately 3 minutes. Results are calculated instantly in your browser.

Privacy Notice: Your responses are processed entirely within your browser using client-side JavaScript. No information you enter is transmitted to our servers, stored, or shared with any third party at any stage.
Part 1 — Company Red Flag Indicators

These are common indicators that a company may require additional scrutiny. Answer all questions, then calculate your Part 1 result before proceeding to Part 2.

Shareholding Structure
Q1. Is the Thai/Foreign split exactly 51/49, maximising foreign ownership while maintaining Thai majority?
Land Holding
Q2. Does the company (or a related entity) hold land title in Thailand?
Thai Shareholder Profile
Q3. Is your Thai shareholder listed as a shareholder or director in multiple other companies?
Q4. Does your Thai shareholder appear to have limited financial means inconsistent with their level of investment in your company?
Company Activity
Q5. Does the company have minimal or no regular transactions (fewer than 10 per month)?
Q6. Is the company’s registered address shared with more than 5 other registered companies?
Corporate Governance
Q7. Does your Thai shareholder attend AGMs or EGMs in person?
Q8. Did your Thai shareholder physically and personally sign AGM/EGM minutes (not via a proxy or digitally)?
Part 2 — Shareholder Relationship Review

Each “No” answer highlights elements that regulators consider when assessing whether a genuine shareholder relationship exists. Answer honestly for an accurate picture of your risk.

A. Your Relationship
Q1. Have you met your Thai shareholder in person?
Q2. Do they understand their role and responsibilities as a shareholder?
B. Financial Contribution
Q3. Did they contribute actual funds to acquire their shares?
Q4. Can that contribution be evidenced by bank transfer or receipts?
Q5. Was the amount proportionate to their shareholding percentage?
Q6. Was their share purchase funded by a loan from you or another foreign party?
C. Participation & Control
Q7. Do they attend and participate in shareholder meetings?
Q8. Do they participate in key business decisions proportionate to their stake?
Q9. Do they review and sign corporate documents personally?
Q10. Is there a side agreement, undated share transfer, or power of attorney that transfers control to a foreign party?
D. Suitability & Background
Q11. Do they have relevant education or professional experience related to the company’s business?
Q12. Do they have a genuine interest in the company’s operations and success?
E. Documentation
Q13. Are their signatures on AGM/EGM minutes genuine and signed in person at the meeting?
Q14. Were they actually present for meetings their name appears in?
Q15. Is there evidence they reviewed annual accounts, affidavits, or BOD resolutions before signing?

If Your Assessment Flags a Problem

Discovering that your current structure may constitute a nominee arrangement is concerning — but it is rarely catastrophic. Thai enforcement generally focuses on willful, ongoing violations. Companies that take proactive steps to review and address compliance issues are in a far stronger position than those who wait for enforcement to arrive.

Restructure with Genuine Partners

Replace nominee Thai shareholders with genuine Thai business partners who make real financial contributions and participate actively in the business. This is the most straightforward route to a compliant Thai-majority structure.

Convert to a Compliant Foreign Structure

Depending on your sector, nationality, and investment level, you may be able to convert to a fully foreign-owned structure via Amity Treaty, a Foreign Business License, or BOI promotion — eliminating the need for Thai majority ownership entirely.

Divest or Unwind Gracefully

In some cases — particularly where the business has run its course or the investor wishes to exit — an orderly divestment or company dissolution is the cleanest path. We advise on how to unwind a structure in a way that minimises exposure.

The Honest Reality

Getting flagged by the DBD is not automatically the end of your business in Thailand. The enforcement process typically begins with a request for documents and an opportunity to explain or rectify the structure. Companies that are already working with a lawyer and have a compliance plan in place are treated very differently from those who ignore the problem. The earlier you act, the more options you have.

Get in Touch

All enquiries are handled in strict confidence. Send us a message and a member of our team will be in touch shortly.